![]() Those raw numbers help in determining how fundamentally fast the deck could start, but again - we have to assume that an opponent will be ready for it. Now granted Kevin, your numbers have provided some key information, but your test hands also didn't take into account what your percentages would have been had you been playing against disruption/counter-magic, and that makes a world of difference as Legacy right now is circling in a world of Dazes. strategically requires you to play with your deck differently in a big way, and it might not necessarily be for the good. Against decks like Storm, you can afford the loss of a card because you're also running Chancellor, which could buy you a turn in the instance you draw into a Lion's Eye Diamond. Lion's Eye Diamond tricks the Manaless player into getting greedy and mulliganing more aggressively, and I think that hurts the overall strategy of this deck. It's a critical "draw now" component when you want to accelerate into the win. Gitaxian Probe offers everything you could want at practically no cost. ![]() I don't want to lose (or at least fall back on) Lion's Eye Diamond as a full-blown win condition unless I'm playing against Storm. ![]() I'm finding Faerie Macabre to be far more useful, and I think Legacy right now is predicated on cheap counters and a high level of interactivity. Lion's Eye Diamond is really good, but I've actually shifted a set of those with Deep Analysis into the sideboard. It's obviously a "flex" slot (if you want to call it that), but I feel as though the information it provides, how well it plays with Cabal Therapy, its basically "free" cost, and that it accelerates a dredger is absolutely huge in this deck. I think cutting Gitaxian Probe could be a mistake.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |